<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battle of Wanat Historical Analysis:  Rough Draft Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/battle-of-wanat-historical-analysis-rough-draft-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content</link>
	<description>Afghanistan 2004, Iraq 2007</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:01:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taliban disguised as US troops attack Nato bases</title>
		<link>http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/battle-of-wanat-historical-analysis-rough-draft-release/comment-page-1/#comment-15344</link>
		<dc:creator>Taliban disguised as US troops attack Nato bases</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 05:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/?page_id=1969#comment-15344</guid>
		<description>[...] of the growing sophistication in Taliban tactics.    Then you are pointing to the wrong place.   Battle of Wanat Historical Analysis: Rough Draft ReleasebyA Battlefield Tourist  Overall, by the standards of US army historians, the casualties inflected at the battle of Wanat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the growing sophistication in Taliban tactics.    Then you are pointing to the wrong place.   Battle of Wanat Historical Analysis: Rough Draft ReleasebyA Battlefield Tourist  Overall, by the standards of US army historians, the casualties inflected at the battle of Wanat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The real detailed afgan fight - INGunOwners</title>
		<link>http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/battle-of-wanat-historical-analysis-rough-draft-release/comment-page-1/#comment-15113</link>
		<dc:creator>The real detailed afgan fight - INGunOwners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/?page_id=1969#comment-15113</guid>
		<description>[...] The real detailed afgan fight   A interesting but long read for anyone interested in what some of our troops have been through in Afghanistan.  * Battle of Wanat Historical Analysis: Rough Draft Release*by*A Battlefield Tourist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The real detailed afgan fight   A interesting but long read for anyone interested in what some of our troops have been through in Afghanistan.  * Battle of Wanat Historical Analysis: Rough Draft Release*by*A Battlefield Tourist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vuurwapen Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/battle-of-wanat-historical-analysis-rough-draft-release/comment-page-1/#comment-14222</link>
		<dc:creator>Vuurwapen Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 05:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/?page_id=1969#comment-14222</guid>
		<description>[...] to believe that the malfunctions led to the deaths of the Soldiers. This is false. I have read the entire rough draft of the report on the battle of Wanat, and could find three references to inoperable M4s &#8211; one undescribed malfunction, one weapon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to believe that the malfunctions led to the deaths of the Soldiers. This is false. I have read the entire rough draft of the report on the battle of Wanat, and could find three references to inoperable M4s &#8211; one undescribed malfunction, one weapon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Fox News is Wrong About the M4 Carbine &#171; Vuurwapen Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/battle-of-wanat-historical-analysis-rough-draft-release/comment-page-1/#comment-14221</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Fox News is Wrong About the M4 Carbine &#171; Vuurwapen Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 05:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/?page_id=1969#comment-14221</guid>
		<description>[...] to believe that the malfunctions led to the deaths of the Soldiers. This is false. I have read the entire rough draft of the report on the battle of Wanat, and could find three references to inoperable M4s &#8211; one undescribed malfunction, one weapon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to believe that the malfunctions led to the deaths of the Soldiers. This is false. I have read the entire rough draft of the report on the battle of Wanat, and could find three references to inoperable M4s &#8211; one undescribed malfunction, one weapon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Now what? - Page 2</title>
		<link>http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/battle-of-wanat-historical-analysis-rough-draft-release/comment-page-1/#comment-9221</link>
		<dc:creator>Now what? - Page 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/?page_id=1969#comment-9221</guid>
		<description>[...] highly recommend this article written by a historian in the Combat Studies Institute. The author was unhappy that his draft was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] highly recommend this article written by a historian in the Combat Studies Institute. The author was unhappy that his draft was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The truth behind the recent M4 controversy &#124; The Firearm Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/battle-of-wanat-historical-analysis-rough-draft-release/comment-page-1/#comment-9159</link>
		<dc:creator>The truth behind the recent M4 controversy &#124; The Firearm Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/?page_id=1969#comment-9159</guid>
		<description>[...] by the Associated Press. At best the writer of the AP article exaggerated many the points. The leaked draft of the of the analysis of the Battle of Wanat reads quite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by the Associated Press. At best the writer of the AP article exaggerated many the points. The leaked draft of the of the analysis of the Battle of Wanat reads quite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Arms Failures Contributed to Wanat Debacle &#124; Whats New? Tech Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/battle-of-wanat-historical-analysis-rough-draft-release/comment-page-1/#comment-9158</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Arms Failures Contributed to Wanat Debacle &#124; Whats New? Tech Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.battlefieldtourist.com/content/?page_id=1969#comment-9158</guid>
		<description>[...] version of the report compiled by the Army Combat Studies Institute at Leavenworth. But we did find a draft version and went through it to find all references to M4s, small arms and the reported [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] version of the report compiled by the Army Combat Studies Institute at Leavenworth. But we did find a draft version and went through it to find all references to M4s, small arms and the reported [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

